"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/04/2014 at 10:32 • Filed to: None
0
6|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/04/2014 at 10:32 • Filed to: None | 0
| 6 |
I can, however, vote in the next presidential election. So I shall.
PS9
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/04/2014 at 10:34 |
|
...I was born just to witness that upcoming clusterfuck of a shitstorm, wasn't I?
goddamnit...
BmanUltima's car still hasn't been fixed yet, he'll get on it tomorrow, honest.
> PS9
11/04/2014 at 10:38 |
|
What's wrong?
kanadanmajava1
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/04/2014 at 10:43 |
|
I hope that the presidents can someday ride nice convertibles again.
|
PS9
> BmanUltima's car still hasn't been fixed yet, he'll get on it tomorrow, honest.
11/04/2014 at 10:50 |
|
Candidates who will govern as if one is a mirror of the other no matter who wins
A system that utterly destroys the chances any third party candidate has of winning. Nothing is more futile than running a third party campaign in America.
A Media that can manipulate the voting public and affect policy without consequence or responsibility
A totally broken campaign finance system that allows anyone with enough money to buy the candidate they want.
A government that has been ground to a halt by partisanship and infighting, to the point of doing almost nothing.
The people who think the thing mentioned above is a good idea
Gerrymandering.
There are tens of millions of other things wrong, but these are the top seven.
|
BmanUltima's car still hasn't been fixed yet, he'll get on it tomorrow, honest.
> PS9
11/04/2014 at 10:55 |
|
Sounds terrible. Good thing I'm in Canada where people are angry that a crack smoking mayor's brother didn't win. Can't imagine if it was that bad here.
sellphones2493
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/04/2014 at 11:48 |
|
I luckily voted - but it may be useless in the One-Party State of Maryland. If the machines are 'lacking calibration', flipping votes in front of people , who knows what they did with my absentee ballot.